A Grindr encounter, a fractured neck, and the limits of consent in the law.
Joshua Baxter, left, and Michael Barron (Image: Instagram/family)You can simply scroll past—but please don't overlook the importance of an independent queer press.
Time is now or never.
Queer voices disappear without independent journalism to amplify them.
We document what others won't touch.
We hold power to account when it threatens our communities.
This work exists only because you choose to fund it directly.
Donate over €25/month and receive our limited-edition tote bag — a badge of resistance, a statement that you stand for fearless journalism.
We are grateful!
Can't donate? Sharing our work helps more than you think
You can simply scroll past — but please don’t overlook the importance of an independent queer press.
You can simply scroll past—but please don't overlook the importance of an independent queer press.
Time is now or never.
Queer voices disappear without independent journalism to amplify them.
We document what others won't touch.
We hold power to account when it threatens our communities.
This work exists only because you choose to fund it directly.
Donate over €25/month and receive our limited-edition tote bag — a badge of resistance, a statement that you stand for fearless journalism.
We are grateful!
Can't donate? Sharing our work helps more than you think
The prosecutor read the messages without inflexion. Anne Whyte KC stood before the jury at Minshull Street Crown Court in January 2026, her voice level, and recited what two men had typed to each other on Grindr in the weeks before one of them died. Choking. Rope. Vodka until he could barely walk. Rape role play. In the gallery, relatives of the deceased sat motionless. Nobody coughed. The courtroom had the airlessness of a confessional that has been forced open and lit from above.
Michael Barron was thirty-eight. He had grown up in Piltown, County Kilkenny, and later lived in Waterford in the 1990s and 2000s — not, his family would emphasise, an easy place or time to be openly gay. He chose visibility anyway, left Ireland, and over the years assembled what his relatives called a chosen family: friends in Dublin, then Liverpool, then Manchester, each city adding another layer. He had guest roles in Hollyoaks and Emmerdale. He was, by every account, theatrical and warm, the sort of person who could fill a room within a few minutes through wit alone, though people who knew him well said his real gift was making others feel seen. His mother, Mary Power, described him in court as her best friend. Her wonderful son, brother and uncle, the family said.
Josh Baxter was twenty-eight. He lived in a flat on Lakeside Rise in Blackley, north Manchester. On Grindr, the conversation had moved quickly to specifics. Baxter said he liked it rough and asked whether Barron would let him choke him, tie him up, spit on him, call him names, get him so drunk he was weak and defenceless. He asked about rape role play. Barron replied that he liked to be tied, gagged, hooded, and made helpless. He said he enjoyed pain and torture. The messages were later read aloud in court as evidence. They had not been written with that audience in mind.
Barron arrived at Baxter’s flat at 4.27 in the afternoon on 26 January 2025. They talked about favourite films. They discussed limits. Baxter maintained that Barron said he did not want a safe word. Over the course of the evening, Baxter encouraged Barron to drink vodka in large quantities — the prosecution told the jury he had instructed Barron to drink until he could barely stand. Earlier in the day, the two men had tried to source ketamine; later they went out for more alcohol. The last activity on Barron’s phone was a brief call to a drug dealer at 5.45 pm.
Between seven o’clock and 7.56 pm, Baxter’s phone also went silent. Prosecutors said it could reasonably be inferred that during this period they had sex. Baxter restrained Barron face down on the bed with rope — wrists and ankles bound, a makeshift mask covering his face — and lay on top of him for a prolonged period. He choked Barron with enough force to fracture a bone and cartilage in his neck. Oxygen supply to the brain was cut off. Barron went into cardiac arrest.
At 7.56 pm, Baxter picked up his phone again and messaged other Grindr users. Barron was still bound on the bed. Baxter said later that he had noticed Barron’s face was purple but could hear what he took to be snoring, so he believed there was no medical emergency. At around nine that evening, he ordered food on Deliveroo: two chicken burgers, fries, and onion rings. He went downstairs to collect the delivery. When he came back up, the purple had deepened, and the snoring had stopped.
His search history, recovered by police, recorded what happened next. He typed “purple face while sleeping”. Then, “how to tell if someone is alive.” Then “, how to tell if someone is breathing.” He called 999 and was instructed to perform CPR. In the early hours of 27 January, a further search: “if you accidentally kill someone by strangling them in sex, do you go to prison?”
Michael Barron was dead.
Baxter denied manslaughter, intentional strangulation or suffocation, and unlawfully inflicting grievous bodily harm. In the witness box, he was composed. “I never saw it as a dangerous activity,” he said of choking. “I have never hurt someone before, choking.” He maintained the injury was accidental, and the acts were consensual throughout.
The prosecution’s argument was not about prudery. It was about what Baxter had known before he walked into that bedroom. A month prior to Barron’s death, he had received a warning from another person about the dangers of choking during sex. He had then gone online and researched those dangers himself. Whyte KC’s case was that Baxter had foreseen a risk of serious harm and chosen to proceed — that consent, however enthusiastic, was no defence once he understood what could go wrong and went ahead regardless. “We suggest he foresaw the risk, and unreasonably took it precisely because the risks and control involved were part of the very specific sexual activity that he wanted to engage in,” she told the jury.
For the defence, Louise Sweet KC argued that Baxter had genuinely never imagined Barron would come to harm. The internet searches, she said, were not the calculations of a man weighing his legal exposure but the desperate flailing of someone in shock. “There is no normal reaction, only shock, disbelief, anxiety, numbness, fear,” she told the court. “He was scared about what people would think of what he and Mr Barron had been doing.”
The jury acquitted Baxter of manslaughter but convicted him of intentional strangulation or suffocation and unlawfully inflicting grievous bodily harm. In her sentencing remarks, Judge Tina Landale said Baxter had arranged to meet Barron for an extreme sexual encounter, had encouraged him to become extremely drunk, and had choked him so forcefully that bone and cartilage fractured. She noted he had admitted to a probation officer that he had repeatedly choked Barron while the man lay tied face down. She rejected his claim of remorse outright: throughout his evidence, she said, he had shown no insight into his behaviour, no acceptance of responsibility, and a poor understanding of consent. Four years’ imprisonment.
English law has drawn a hard boundary around consent and serious bodily harm since the House of Lords ruled in R v Brown in 1993 that willing participants in sadomasochistic acts could still be convicted of assault. The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 went further, making explicit that a person cannot consent to the infliction of serious harm for sexual gratification. In Baxter’s trial, this was not a point of legal philosophy. It was the ground the conviction stood on. However detailed the prior messages, however mutual the stated desires, the law did not bend once the threshold of serious harm had been crossed.
What stayed in the courtroom after the legal arguments had been made was something harder to contain. It was the gap between the Grindr messages and the post-mortem photographs. Between sexual bravado typed on a phone and the pathologist’s description of a fractured bone and cartilage in the neck. Between two chicken burgers sitting on a kitchen counter and a man dying one floor above.
For LGBTQ+ communities watching the trial, the case is uncomfortable in ways that resist neat summary. It involves an app that millions use, sexual practices that are not uncommon, and a death that resulted not from malice, the jury decided, but from recklessness — from a man who knew the risks and kept going. That is not an indictment of queer life or of kink. It is something more ordinary and more difficult: a question about where responsibility lies when desire and danger overlap, and about what happens when the person who should have stopped does not stop.
Barron’s family released a statement after the conviction. They described him as kind, genuine, unique, charismatic, utterly full of life, love and ambition — a natural storyteller who could hold a room. Growing up gay in Ireland had not been easy, they said, but Michael had lived loudly and proudly, and his self-acceptance had paved the way for others. Since his death, messages had arrived from friends across three countries, all saying the same thing: he had given people confidence in who they were. He had taught them to stand tall.
“A part of me died,” Mary Power said in court. “Nothing can prepare you for the loss of a child.”
On Lakeside Rise in Blackley, the streetlights still come on at dusk. The flat has returned to ordinary use. The rope and the bottles were logged into evidence months ago; the bed is gone. The record sits in transcripts and sentencing remarks. Four years. A conviction for intentional strangulation and grievous bodily harm. A man’s life compressed into exhibit numbers and a pathologist’s report on how long the brain can survive without oxygen. Not long. A matter of minutes.
Barron’s family asked, once the trial was over, to be allowed finally to grieve. They said they could not be prouder of the man he was.
They did not mention the messages, or the search history, or the Deliveroo order. What they remembered was his voice.
Subscribe to our newsletter here and support independent journalism.
Join 12,000+ readers who receive it every Wednesday, with exclusive content. For just €5,99
✦✦✦
If you have a tip and wish to contact us securely, you can write to [email protected], our encrypted email address. We take the protection of our sources seriously and guarantee strict confidentiality.
✦✦✦
When we learn of a mistake, we acknowledge it with a correction. If you spot an error, please let us know.
✦✦✦
You can listen to our podcast Queer News & Journalism on your favourite platform or go to our YouTube Channel @GAY45mag.
✦✦✦
Let us know what you think at [email protected].
✦✦✦
Submit a letter to the editor at [email protected].
✦✦✦
We appreciate it. Thanks for reading.
