SiegedSec, a self-described collective of “Gay Furry Hackers”, burst onto the cyberactivist scene in early 2022, rapidly gaining notoriety for a string of high-profile breaches. Their targets ranged from governmental institutions to private corporations, with each attack carrying a potent mix of digital subversion, political intent, and countercultural defiance.
Heritage Foundation and Project 2025
By July 2024, SiegedSec was in retreat. The group announced its dissolution, citing overwhelming public scrutiny, mounting legal threats, and the psychological toll of their activism. The final straw? A breach of the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank behind Project 2025—a blueprint to expand presidential powers and roll back LGBTQ+ rights, particularly in the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory.
In this decisive operation, SiegedSec exfiltrated 2GB of donor records and internal communications. ‘We wanted to shine a light on who exactly funds Heritage,’ Vio, the group’s leader, declared. But what followed was a bizarre and combative exchange. Heritage’s executive director, Mike Howell, engaged in a heated Signal conversation with Vio, branding SiegedSec members as ‘degenerate perverts’ and promising FBI retribution. The leaked messages revealed a fixation on the hackers’ sexual and subcultural identities—an irony lost on Heritage, whose ideological crusade often hinges on moral high ground.
It was an unceremonious end to a two-year campaign of cyber resistance. In their final communiqué, SiegedSec admitted exhaustion: ‘We’re tired.’ It was an unusually candid moment for a group that had thrived on bravado and digital chaos. SiegedSec had wielded hacking as both a tool and a spectacle, exposing systemic vulnerabilities while reshaping the boundaries of digital activism. Their leaks included NATO intelligence, confidential US state government files, and data from far-right networks. Unlike traditional hacktivist collectives, SiegedSec operated with deliberate flamboyance, embedding their queer and furry identities into the very fabric of their defiance.
Inside Gay Furry Hackers
SiegedSec emerged in early 2022 under the leadership of an individual using the alias “Vio”. The group’s Telegram channel, created in April 2022, quickly gained notoriety for its irreverent tone and unabashed embrace of LGBTQ+ and furry subcultures. Unlike traditional hacktivist collectives such as Anonymous or WikiLeaks, SiegedSec openly identified as a black-hat group, prioritising disruption over systemic change. Vio described their mission as a blend of ‘fun and chaos,’ though they occasionally aligned with hacktivist causes, particularly those opposing anti-trans legislation. Vio acknowledged that their actions could inadvertently harm LGBTQ+ individuals but defended the group as ‘chaotic neutral.’ Their Telegram broadcasts were laced with a playfulness, from rainbow-themed insignia to declarations like ‘UwU gay furries pwn you~.’ This aesthetic was both a statement and a shield, blurring the lines between satire and activism. This resonated with online communities but also invited dismissiveness.
Unlike traditional hacktivist groups, SiegedSec wasn’t content to operate in the shadows or adopt a menacing, anonymous persona. Instead, they leaned into absurdity, often issuing demands and statements that veered into the surreal. In their infamous breach of the Idaho National Laboratory in November 2023 the hackers not only compromised a leading U.S. nuclear research facility but also issued a bizarre demand straight from an anime fever dream: ‘Start researching IRL catgirls.’
SiegedSec’s fusion of cyber warfare with queer subculture baffled mainstream media, who often reduced them to a novelty. But to the group, their identity was integral. ‘We were truly LGBT. More gay, but the entire spectrum,’ said Viktor, a former member who spoke to us under anonymity. ‘Most of us are, excuse the arrogance, geniuses.’ SiegedSec’s members, many of whom had lucrative tech jobs, financed their activities independently, dismissing allegations of financial motives. ‘We made enough money from our jobs,’ said Viktor.
SiegedSec’s ‘Gay Furry Hackers’ distinguished themselves by embracing the ‘gay furry’ subculture, a community that combines LGBTQ+ identities with anthropomorphic animal personas. This unique identity was not merely aesthetic; it was central to their hacktivist principles, blending cultural expression with political activism. Media coverage often reduced their actions to clickbait headlines, overshadowing substantive critiques of their targets.
Gay Furry Hackers operations were often politically charged, targeting entities they viewed as adversaries to LGBTQ+ rights. Their attacks on U.S. state agencies that enacted anti-trans legislation exemplify their commitment to counteracting policies they deemed oppressive.
This odd blend of whimsy and radical intent defined their ethos. In their brief but impactful existence, SiegedSec targeted entities they viewed as threats to LGBTQ+ rights and freedoms. State agencies enacting anti-trans legislation found themselves in the group’s crosshairs, as did far-right media outlets like Real America’s Voice and conservative think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation. Their attacks weren’t mere pranks; they were messages delivered with the blunt force of a data breach. This duality characterised their approach to digital resistance. Their approach to digital activism, while controversial, has established new parameters for understanding how marginalised communities might leverage technical expertise to pursue social change.
The Cultural and Political Nexus
Their operational methodology raised significant questions about the evolution of digital resistance movements. By integrating subcultural identity with tactical capabilities, SiegedSec demonstrated how modern activism could leverage both technical vulnerabilities and cultural disruption. This dual-vector approach proved particularly effective in challenging traditional power structures while simultaneously asserting the legitimacy of marginalised identities in digital spaces.
To understand SiegedSec, one must first understand the culture they claimed as their own. The furry community, often misunderstood, is a vibrant subculture where participants adopt anthropomorphic animal personas. For the Gay Furry Hackers, this was more than an aesthetic—it was a statement of identity, a rejection of societal norms, and a celebration of fluidity. Coupled with their LGBTQ+ identities, SiegedSec’s existence became a reclamation of agency in digital spaces often hostile to queerness.
Their operations were as political as they were personal. The July 2024 hack of the Heritage Foundation, for instance, was a direct response to Project 2025, a policy agenda they saw as a threat to LGBTQ+ rights. In leaking user data from the conservative think tank, SiegedSec aimed to expose the vulnerabilities of those they perceived as oppressors.
But life in the digital trenches comes at a cost. By mid-2024, SiegedSec found itself grappling with the consequences of its notoriety.
Their departure left a trail of questions. Was SiegedSec a glimpse into the future of activism, where identity and protest intertwine in the ungovernable expanse of cyberspace? Or were they a fleeting anomaly, their tactics too extreme for mainstream acceptance? Perhaps the answer lies in the fluidity they championed—a refusal to be boxed in, even by the expectations of their own movement.
SiegedSec’s trajectory mirrors earlier groups like LulzSec, which prioritised ‘lulz’ (laughs) over ideology before disbanding under legal pressure. However, their integration of LGBTQ+ advocacy into hacking represents a novel development. Unlike WikiLeaks’ focus on transparency or Anonymous’ broad anti-establishment campaigns, SiegedSec fused identity politics with cybercrime—a reflection of Gen Z’s digital-native activism.
In the aftermath, their legacy remains a topic of debate. SiegedSec’s actions forced conversations about the power dynamics of the digital age. They revealed the vulnerabilities of institutions and the lengths to which individuals will go to defend their identities and communities. They were an emblem of the times—a reminder that even the most unexpected voices can, with the right code, make themselves heard.
– – –
GAY45 is committed to publishing a diversity of journalism, prose, and poetry. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. And here’s our email if you want to send a letter: [email protected].
– – –
TODAY IS NOT AN EASY DAY
Queer press and books are forced into silence. Donald Trump is the president-elect of the USA.
Far-right political movements dominate Europe.
But we have something powerful on our side. We’ve got you. You make us strong.
GAY45 is funded by readers. Our editors decide what we publish—no one else.
Donate as much as you can. Every 5€ is a way to help the community, the independent press and fight against silence.
GAY45 is Europe’s leading queer magazine of culture, politics and ideas. Because of you.
Donate to support our Queer Journalism Campus and GAY45 now.
We appreciate it. Thanks for reading.
