Europe’s long-simmering gender debate has crossed the Channel. What began in Britain’s tabloid columns and feminist salons has now taken root in Brussels and Vienna, reborn as an intellectual crusade under the banner of “sex-based rights.” At its centre stands the newly minted Athena Forum—a Vienna think tank backed by British allies such as Sex Matters and the Lesbian Project—determined to roll back what it calls the “ideological capture” of European institutions by gender identity politics. To supporters, it is a fight for clarity and biological reality; to critics, it is Britain’s culture war exported, dressed in the language of feminism and human rights. Just a few weeks ago, Hadja Lahbib, the EU Commissioner for Equality, unveiled the European Commission’s LGBTQ+ Equality Strategy 2026–2030, describing the European Union as a “lighthouse of hope and guardian” for queer people.
Illustration: GAY45You can simply scroll past—but please don't overlook the importance of an independent queer press.
Time is now or never.
Queer voices disappear without independent journalism to amplify them.
We document what others won't touch.
We hold power to account when it threatens our communities.
This work exists only because you choose to fund it directly.
Donate over €25/month and receive our limited-edition tote bag — a badge of resistance, a statement that you stand for fearless journalism.
We are grateful!
Can't donate? Sharing our work helps more than you think
You can simply scroll past — but please don’t overlook the importance of an independent queer press.
You can simply scroll past—but please don't overlook the importance of an independent queer press.
Time is now or never.
Queer voices disappear without independent journalism to amplify them.
We document what others won't touch.
We hold power to account when it threatens our communities.
This work exists only because you choose to fund it directly.
Donate over €25/month and receive our limited-edition tote bag — a badge of resistance, a statement that you stand for fearless journalism.
We are grateful!
Can't donate? Sharing our work helps more than you think
Athena Forum Vienna
In Vienna, an Austrian think tank was quietly launched, positioning itself at the forefront of what could become Europe’s next culture war. Dubbed Athena Forum, the group bills itself as a champion of ‘sex-based rights’, and a counterweight to what Sex Matters calls “gender identity ideology [capturing] European institutions.” Its founder and director, Faika El-Nagashi, is a former Green Party parliamentarian in Austria with decades of LGBTQ+ advocacy behind her. El-Nagashi was once embedded in the very establishment she now rebukes – from ILGA-Europe’s boardrooms to feminist NGOs – but she broke ranks over the primacy of biological sex in policy. By October 2025, she formally launched Athena Forum as a self-described non-partisan think tank promoting “sex-based rights, democratic values and political courage” across Europe.
From the outset, Athena Forum cast its mission in grand terms. In its first report, Beneath the Surface: How Gender Identity is Reshaping Europe, El-Nagashi and co-author Anna Zobnina argue that European law and governance are undergoing a “structural transformation” in how sex and gender are understood. They contend that in recent years, EU officials have shifted from recognising biological sex to promoting self-defined gender identity – thereby eroding what they view as hard-won sex-based rights for women and same-sex oriented people. The report warns that concepts like ‘gender identity’ have seeped into EU equality directives, data collection and funding priorities, largely “behind closed doors”, via soft-law guidelines and internal training rather than open democratic debate. As a result, El-Nagashi writes, “clarity in law, the meaning of ‘woman’, the basis for sex-based rights […] erode under the weight of ideological capture.” What others hail as inclusion, Athena Forum decries as institutional “confusion” – a blurring of lines between male and female that it argues undermines women’s safety, children’s welfare, lesbian identity and even free speech.
Athena Forum’s emergence did not happen in a vacuum. El-Nagashi’s turn from mainstream LGBTQ circles to leading a “gender critical” insurgency reflects wider tremours across Europe’s progressive landscape. By her account, simply insisting that “men and women are different groups” got her shunned by some of the same organisations she once helped build. Now, with Athena Forum, she has teamed up with disaffected feminists and gay-rights veterans who share a conviction that Europe’s institutions – from the European Commission in Brussels to the Council of Europe in Strasbourg – have lost touch with material reality. The group’s language is unmistakably combative: they describe themselves as a band of advocates defying an “institutional consensus” that neglects “sex-based women’s rights [and] same-sex orientation as […] legally distinct [categories] grounded in biological sex”.. In place of that consensus, they call for a return to “clarity, evidence and courage”, as well as an increase of accountability in European policy. It is a message calibrated to tap into public unease over fast-moving changes in gender norms, and it is delivered with the zeal of insurgents convinced they’re reclaiming reality itself.
In a declaration for GAY45, Julian Wiehl, editor of Vangardist magazine and co-founder of Queer Media Literacy in Vienna, stated: “Trans rights are merely the testing ground for dismantling hard-won LGB and women’s rights. It is alarming that some of the loudest voices now aligning with Europe’s far right once came from within feminist and queer movements. Expelled from their own communities for radicalism, they’ve regrouped in an alliance of the ignorant and the bitter, dressing outdated ideology as ‘free speech.’ What they miss is that feminism has evolved—today’s intersectional and queer feminisms are inherently trans-inclusive, rejecting the TERF dogmas of the 1970s.”
The British Roots of the Backlash
Observers of British politics will find Athena Forum’s rhetoric strikingly familiar. Years before these ideas took root in Vienna or Brussels, a similar battle over trans rights was blazing in the United Kingdom – and the language of ‘sex-based rights’ was honed by a network of British activists now exporting their playbook across the Channel. In fact, Athena Forum’s creation was directly nurtured by British allies. The UK-based campaign Sex Matters, led by Maya Forstater, proudly announced that it “supported the foundation of Athena Forum”, heralding it as a “much-needed European initiative to fight for sex-based rights and re-ignite political courage”. Forstater herself wrote the foreword to Athena’s Beneath the Surface report, calling on supporters to “speak up about the issues this report so clearly reveals” . The British imprimatur is hard to miss: within days of its launch on 3 October 2025, El-Nagashi’s initiative was amplified in UK gender-critical circles as the vanguard of a new European front.
To understand this British connection, one must rewind to the late 2010s and early 2020s, when the UK became a laboratory for organised opposition to transgender inclusion. A loose coalition of journalists, academics and self-described feminists began pushing back against proposed reforms like gender self-identification, raising alarm that women’s single-sex spaces and lesbian identities were under threat. Central to this coalition was Maya Forstater, a think-tank researcher whose fight to have her gender-critical beliefs protected under law eventually succeeded on appeal. She parlayed the momentum into founding Sex Matters in 2021. The group’s mission is openly stated: to campaign for “sex-based” rights by “promot[ing] clarity” that sex means ‘biological sex’ (i.e. sex assigned at birth) in law and policy. In practice, Sex Matters has lobbied for everything from reinstating single-sex toilets to ensuring sports bodies exclude trans women from women’s competitions. It also spearheaded a high-profile petition urging the UK government to amend the Equality Act 2010 to explicitly define ‘sex’ as ‘biological’, with the claim that the current wording causes confusion over whether trans women count as female.
That petition, launched by Forstater in late 2022, became a pivotal moment in Britain’s trans debate. It rapidly gained support from prominent figures concerned about “eroding women’s rights” – none more influential than J.K. Rowling. On International Women’s Day in 2023, the Harry Potter author tweeted her endorsement: “If you’re concerned about the erosion of women’s rights in the UK… sign the Sex Matters petition to make the Equality Act clear.” . Rowling’s intervention turbo-charged the campaign, helping it soar past the 100,000 signatures needed to force a parliamentary debate. By the petition’s close in April 2023, over 109,000 people had signed in support of defining sex as biological. The Westminster debate that summer crystallised how polarised Britain had become: a counter-petition opposing any change to the Equality Act actually garnered even more signatures (nearly 139,000) from those warning it would strip away protections for transgender people . Nonetheless, the movement Forstater helped spark won a major symbolic victory when the UK’s Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) weighed in on their side. In a formal letter to the government on 3 April 2023, the EHRC – under chair Kishwer Falkner – advised that amending “sex” to mean biological sex would bring “greater legal clarity” and create “rationalisations” of areas like single-sex services, sports and gay/lesbian associations. This marked a startling shift for Britain’s equalities watchdog and signalled to ‘gender-critical’ campaigners that the wind was in their sails.
Another prong of the British backlash emerged from within the LGBTQ+ community itself, led by lesbians disaffected with the broadening of queer activism. The Lesbian Project was launched in early March 2023 by veteran campaigners Julie Bindel and Kathleen Stock, explicitly to champion “same-sex attracted females” and carve out space for lesbians apart from the LGBTQ umbrella. While the founders insisted that their aim was simply to refocus lesbians’ needs, the project’s messaging echoed themes of the wider ‘gender-critical’ movement. Its very first principle declared: “By definition, only females can be lesbians, in virtue of their biological sex” – effectively attempting to exclude trans women from a lesbian identity. Stock, a former philosophy professor who resigned following backlash for her views, and Bindel, a longtime radical feminist writer, used the project to argue that the ‘L’ in LGBTQIA+ was being erased by gender-neutral ideology. They attracted enthusiastic support from Britain’s gender-critical circles (and no shortage of criticism from other queer women); at the Lesbian Project’s first public event in London, protesters from a trans-inclusive collective called The Dyke Project picketed outside with signs declaring “we are one community”. The Lesbian Project’s launch underscored how deep the rift had grown within the UK’s LGBT movement – and it demonstrated the ‘sex-based’ wing’s savvy at garnering media attention.
Together with groups like LGB Alliance (founded in 2019 to oppose “gender ideology” in LGBT advocacy) and a coterie of outspoken journalists, these organisations built what sociologists have called a “miasma of anti-trans campaign groups […] united in their antipathy” to transgender rights. Their efforts reframed Britain’s trans rights debate into a zero-sum clash of sex versus gender. On one side, trans people and allies pushed for laws to simplify legal gender change and ban conversion therapy for gender identity. On the other hand, ‘sex-based rights’ campaigners argued that those very policies put women and girls in danger. This narrative – that advancing trans inclusion undermines gays, lesbians and women – found receptive ears well beyond fringe circles. By late 2023, even some U.K. ministers echoed the talking points; Kemi Badenoch, the equality minister at the time, openly considered rewriting the Equality Act’s definitions, and the Conservative government she was a part of blocked Scotland’s attempt to introduce a gender self-identification law, citing women’s safety. In effect, the U.K. had become a test case for a coordinated anti-trans agenda packaged as common-sense protection of women’s rights. And it was precisely this agenda that the Athena Forum now aims to take pan-European.
Crossing the Channel
The British influence on Athena Forum goes beyond moral support and into strategy and personnel. The Forum’s founding document was produced “with support from Sex Matters”, effectively twinning it with Forstater’s London-based outfit from day one. Its core arguments mirror those made in British courtrooms and petitions: that terms like ‘gender identity’ have stealthily replaced ‘sex’ in European policies, muddying the legal waters and silencing dissenting voices in the name of inclusion. As such, El-Nagashi and her colleagues frame themselves as the silenced dissenters now roaring back. “We have watched the meaning of woman […] erode […] This shift isn’t just linguistic; it’s structural,” they write, decrying how women’s groups and even data on sex have been subsumed under a vision that clashes with theirs. If their sentiment sounds familiar, it’s because British campaigners honed it in recent years. Now separated from the EU by Brexit, many of those Britons are eagerly inserting themselves into the continental debate – an irony not lost on observers. As one EU official (who wished to remain anonymous) wryly noted: “Britain may have exited Brussels, but its culture wars sure haven’t.”
The efforts of Athena Forum EU to push this agenda have resonated with veteran activists like Kurt Krickler, founder of HOSI Wien, Austria’s oldest LGBT+ organisation. A campaigner since the late 1970s, Krickler was effectively removed from HOSI Wien’s leadership in 2018 amid a generational changing of the guard, after nearly four decades at its helm. Once a cornerstone of Austria’s gay rights movement, he has since aligned himself with groups critical of gender self-identification policies. Today, Krickler has joined Athena Forum’s core team and collaborates with EGGÖ – the European Society for Sex Justice Austria – working to promote sex-based rights and legal clarity in national debates. His journey from mainstream LGBT advocacy to the new “gender critical” camp epitomises the wider split: veterans who feel the activism of their youth (focused on sexual orientation and sex equality) has been hijacked by what they see as a completely different agenda around gender identity. By lending their credibility and historical perspective, figures like Krickler help Athena Forum portray itself not as anti-LGBT, but as a true defender of gays’ and lesbians’ interests – against what they seem to perceive as an overreach of trans rights. It is a claim hotly contested by the broader LGBTQ+ community, but it gives the Forum a footing in countries like Austria, where home-grown anti-trans organising was previously scant.
Athena Forum and its British allies are not shy about their endgame. They are intent on forcing a Europe-wide reckoning over laws and policies that, in their view, have sprinted ahead of public consent. Nowhere is this clearer than in their opposition to the European Union’s LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy, a five-year policy blueprint updated in October 2025. That strategy, initiated under European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, explicitly supports member states in adopting “accessible legal gender recognition legislation […] based on self‑determination”. It also endorses bans on “conversion therapies” for gender identity and proposes strengthened hate speech rules to protect trans people. Tothe Athena Forum, this is proof of their claim that EU elites are captive to a radical ideology. In their report, they criticise the strategy and note with alarm that it promotes gender self-ID for minors, with a threat of sanctions against countries that challenge this They point to language about withholding EU funds from member states not engaging in “good practice” – read ostensibly as a swipe at Poland’s anti-LGBT zones, but interpreted by the Forum as bullying of any nation that “resists a shift from sex-based to gender-based equality”.
The European Commission, for its part, maintains that strengthening LGBTQ+ protections is a matter of core EU values. When unveiling the 2026–2030 strategy, the Equality Commissioner emphatically declared that “we are going further to build a union that is more just, more equal and free for all LGBTQ+ people.” A LinkedIn post by the European Commission stated that “equality is not negotiable”. But Athena Forum and their British partners see negotiability everywhere: they spy a chance to roll back what they view as governmental overreach. Maya Forstater, watching from London, has been unabashed in her disdain for Brussels’ approach. “European bureaucrats are waving rainbow flags but denying what it means to be same-sex attracted,” she said, reacting to the Commission’s latest proposals. “It is a mercy that British campaigners for sex-based rights don’t have to deal with this sinister strategy and the pernicious capture of EU institutions, on top of our own challenges.” Her comments neatly encapsulate the ‘us vs. them’ framing: on one side, grassroots defenders of reality; on the other, remote elites foisting a gender agenda on unwilling populations.
Clashing Visions and Unlikely Alliances
As Athena Forum links up with British and other international allies, Europe is bracing for a collision of worldviews that, until recently, might have seemed relegated to internet forums or U.K. talk shows. The controversy over gender self-ID is no longer an Anglo-American export; it has become a live issue in EU politics. In Germany, the government passed a self-ID law in 2023, allowing adults to change their legal gender via a simple registry declaration, replacing decades-old medicalised procedures. Spain, Ireland, Denmark, and several other European countries have also moved to depathologise gender recognition and trust individuals’ self-definition of their gender. Such moves were celebrated by human rights groups and align with rulings from the European Court of Human Rights affirming the right to legal gender recognition. The EU’s own stance, as reflected in the LGBTIQ Strategy, is that someone’s gender not being recognised is a serious harm – in other words, that trans rights are human rights. This is the new consensus that Faika El-Nagashi and her colleagues are openly challenging.
Critics allege that Athena Forum and its British boosters are repackaging old prejudices in progressive clothing. LGBTQI advocacy groups across Europe note that the self-proclaimed defenders of ‘sex-based rights’ often find common cause with conservative and far-right forces hostile to all LGBT rights. For example, Poland’s and Hungary’s governments, which have passed outright anti-trans and anti-gay measures, also rail against ‘gender ideology’ in rhetoric strikingly similar to Athena’s publications. As such, mainstream human rights organisations worry that the rise of such narratives could roll back protections – not only for trans people but for women and minorities too. “Amid an organised and escalating pushback against LGBTI rights […] what we need now is political courage and a clear signal that equality is not negotiable,” warned Katrin Hugendubel, Advocacy Director of ILGA-Europe, in response to the new EU strategy. To LGBT activists, groups like Athena Forum are not feminist heroes but the latest front of a reactionary backlash targeting anyone outside a strict binary. They argue that phrases like ‘gender ideology’ and ‘sex-based rights’ are dog whistles that flip the script – casting a vulnerable minority (trans people) as oppressors of the majority.
Yet Athena Forum’s supporters insist they are the true progressives, bravely speaking an unpopular truth to power. British columnist Josephine Bartosch, a vocal defender of the ‘gender critical’ camp, contends that acknowledging ‘biological sex’ has become a new heresy. “[We] need not be ashamed of knowing that sex is real any more than we are of being lesbian,” Bartosch wrote, arguing that the rush to avoid offence has birthed a ‘gender theocracy’, in which stating basic facts is now essentially taboo. This sense of embattlement – of forbidden knowledge being suppressed by authorities – fuels the resolve of those rallying under Athena’s banner. It has also led to some unusual alliances. In the UK, feminist academics like Kathleen Stock found themselves praised by socially conservative tabloids normally hostile to feminism. In Europe, we now see left-wing veterans like El-Nagashi and Krickler effectively on the same side of the barricades as right-wing politicians who reject trans rights on religious or nationalist grounds. What unites them is a shared belief that the definition of ‘male’ and ‘female’ is under existential threat.
A Culture War Comes to Brussels
With culture-war issues increasingly seeping into EU discourse, the stage is set for a showdown. Athena Forum has begun courting members of the European Parliament and national legislators who are sympathetic to its cause. Its report urges policymakers to scrutinise the “broader consequences” of gender-related measures that it claims have been adopted without proper debate. Meanwhile, the European Commission and allied governments are pressing ahead with proposals to strengthen LGBTQ+ protections, undeterred by warnings of backlash. The question is whether the ‘gender critical”’movement will gain significant traction at the European level – enough to slow or alter the trajectory of EU policy.
If Britain’s experience is any guide, the conflict will only intensify. In the UK, what started as Twitter arguments and fringe meetings transformed within a few years into new organisations, legal challenges, parliamentary debates, and a palpable chilling effect on discussions of gender. Something analogous may now be unfolding in the EU, albeit belatedly and complicated by 27 different national contexts. The Athena Forum is betting that there is a substantial constituency of Europeans – from parents worried about school policies, to lesbians disillusioned with Pride events, to bureaucrats quietly sceptical of new norms – who can be mobilised under the banner of ‘sex-based rights’. Their British partners have shown them how a small, determined group can change the terms of debate. It was, after all, Britain’s gender-critical activists who turned ‘adult human female’ into a political slogan emblazoned on T-shirts and who convinced a bestselling author to use her global platform to question trans inclusion.
Whether Athena Forum’s project succeeds or falters will depend on how the rest of Europe responds. Will policymakers and LGBTQ+ advocates treat them as a serious policy voice or as an anti-trans lobby in progressive clothing? Already, some European lawmakers have started to echo the Forum’s concerns. Draft guidance in countries like Finland and Sweden has grown more cautious on youth gender transitions, citing the need for evidence – a tone notably congenial to the ‘gender critical’ perspective. And in Brussels, the European Commission’s push for self-ID and anti-conversion therapy laws has encountered behind-the-scenes hesitancy from a few member states worried about public opinion. The Athena campaign will surely seize on any such hesitation.
What is clear is that Europe is no longer insulated from the gender culture wars that have raged in London and Washington. The clash between an expansive vision of gender rights and a reactive defence of sex-based distinctions has now arrived at the EU’s doorstep. As El-Nagashi and her British comrades rally their troops – invoking Athena, the warrior goddess, as their muse – they are confident that with enough “political courage” they can, in their words, “win back our institutions” . On the other side stand those who see this as a dangerous regression, a revival of outdated biases that Europe had hoped to leave behind. For a continent already wrestling with populism and polarisation, it is one more fault line on which the future of European values may hinge. The coming months and years will reveal whether the Athena Forum marks the beginning of Europe’s next big culture war, or just a noisy last gasp against the continent’s march toward inclusion.
Subscribe to our newsletter here.
* * *
When we learn of a mistake, we acknowledge it with a correction. If you spot an error, please let us know.
* * *
You can listen to our podcast Queer News & Journalism on your favourite platform or go to our YouTube Channel @GAY45mag.
* * *
Let us know what you think at [email protected].
* * *
Submit a letter to the editor at [email protected].
* * *
We appreciate it. Thanks for reading.
